The civil lawsuit claiming that Jane Doe was drugged and raped by seven Chi Phi fraternity members at Cornell University has caused an eruption of content on social media, from the “I am Jane Doe” campaign to help conceal the woman’s identity to celebrities like Florence Pugh posting about the allegations.
Now, a coalition of feminist and tech justice organizations claim Meta is censoring content about the case.
New York’s ‘voluntary intoxication loophole’: The legal gap at the center of the ‘Cornell 7’ case.
“We’re in the midst of a classic censorship cycle designed to silence survivor voices,” said Jenna Sherman, campaign director at women-led gender-justice organization UltraViolet, in a press release shared with Mashable. “First, Cornell tried to cover up this horrific case. Then, legacy media ignored it.”
Jane Doe’s lawsuit brings several claims against the university, including negligence and negligent supervision. Student journalists at The Cornell Daily Sun are credited with amplifying the story.
“Now, after Jane Doe and brave student journalists finally brought this story to light, Meta appears to be censoring content about the case across its platforms,” Sherman continued.
Shortly after Pugh posted a statement in support of Jane Doe, she said Instagram placed a “sensitive-content” warning on her post, which prevented some people from seeing it and scrolling through the carousel. “Am I being censored for talking about rape?” she asked. Meta confirmed to TMZ that it initially placed the warning on the post, but has since lifted it.
But the coalition states that even a second post about the case was covered by the same label. “Pugh is one of many users claiming that their posts are being censored, labeled, or shadowbanned by Instagram, Facebook, and Threads,” they wrote.
UltraViolet, as well as other gender justice, tech accountability, and pro-democracy organizations, have launched a joint campaign in response. In a petition with over 29,000 signatures at the time of this writing, they call on Mark Zuckerberg and Instagram head Adam Mosseri to stop censoring posts about the Cornell case.
“Meta has no business making it difficult for users — and particularly women users — to engage in these conversations. Blocking this content sends a dangerous signal that sounding the alarm on rape culture is worse than rape itself,” the ActionNetwork petition reads. “It feels blatantly obvious that women’s safety is not actually Meta’s priority, but that silencing us is.”
In addition to UltraViolet, the full coalition includes Democracy for America Advocacy Fund, Kairos Fellowship, National Campaign for Justice, National Organization for Women (NOW), National Women’s Defense League (NWDL), Reckoning Action, ReproAction, Repro Uncensored, Safe Horizon, Sexual Violence Prevention Association (SVPA), TakeItBack.Org, The Juggernaut Project, and Women’s March.
In addition to signing the petition, the coalition encourages people to report post takedowns and flags to the nonprofit Repro Uncensored (RU), which tracks instances of post and account removal. RU founder and executive director, Martha Dimitratou, said the reports RU is receiving are deeply concerning and expose harms to freedom of speech and democracy.
“These reports reflect a wider pattern documented by Repro Uncensored in thousands of digital censorship cases across more than 50 countries affecting feminist advocacy, reproductive health information, and communities facing discrimination, with critical information removed, accounts disabled and advocates left without clear explanations or meaningful appeals,” she said. Mashable reported on these instances in May.
“When social media platforms bury conversations about sexual violence, they don’t just limit speech; they help create the silence in which rape culture thrives,” NOW president Kim Villanueva stated in a press release.
Mashable has reached out to Meta for comment.
