Liquid AI Releases LFM2.5-VL-3B: A 3B Vision-Language Model That Reads Screens, Grounds Objects, and Calls Tools On-Device

Yesterday, Liquid AI released LFM2.5-VL-3B. It is a 3.1B-parameter vision-language model built for on-device deployment. The model reads digital screens across mobile, web, and desktop. It grounds objects to coordinates, parses documents and charts, and calls tools from text or image input. Liquid AI reports an average of 69.4 across 28 vision benchmarks. That matches InternVL-3.5-4B and sits 0.7 points behind Qwen3.5-4B, both 4.7B models. The model is non-reasoning, so it answers directly and keeps latency low. It fits in roughly 3 GB of memory and decodes 228 tokens/s on an Apple M5 Max.

Is it deployable?

Yes, the checkpoint ships in four formats: native, GGUF, ONNX, and MLX. Day-one runtimes include llama.cpp, MLX, vLLM, SGLang, and ONNX. It fits in roughly 3 GB of memory.

So, What is new?

LFM2.5-VL-3B extends LFM2-VL-3B along four axes.

Architecture and training

The language backbone is LFM2.5-2.6B. The vision tower is a SigLIP2 NaFlex shape-optimized 400M encoder. NaFlex handles native resolution by splitting large images into non-overlapping 512×512 patches plus a resized whole-image thumbnail. Context length is 32,768 tokens, and 16 languages are supported.

Pre-training used approximately 34T tokens. Vocabulary was doubled to 128K by extending the existing tokenizer in place, which improves non-Latin script coverage. Vision pre-training was scaled 4× in tokens with curated and synthetic caption, OCR, grounding, and instruction-following data.

Post-training is SFT with knowledge distillation from a larger teacher and Antidoom training, followed by multi-reward reinforcement learning.

The model is non-reasoning. It answers directly, which is the design choice behind its latency profile.

Benchmarks

Liquid AI evaluated across 28 vision benchmarks using vLLM 0.26.0 in non-reasoning mode. LFM2.5-VL-3B averages 69.4, matching InternVL-3.5-4B (69.4) and landing 0.7 points behind Qwen3.5-4B (70.1). Both comparison models are 4.7B parameters.

Notable individual results: RealWorldQA 73.1 against InternVL-3.5-4B at 67.7, TextVQA 84.3 against Qwen3.5-4B at 81.2, MMStar 63.3, MathVista-mini 68.5, ChartQA 81.3, DocVQA 91.1, and OCRBench v1 84.2. CountBenchQA regressed to 87.3 from 92.2 in the prior release.

On text-only evaluation, IFEval reaches 82.3, up from 72.9. Gemma-4-E4B still leads there at 87.9.

Key Takeaways


Check out the Technical Details and Model Weights. Also, feel free to follow us on Twitter and don’t forget to join our 150k+ML SubReddit and Subscribe to our Newsletter. Wait! are you on telegram? now you can join us on telegram as well.

Need to partner with us for promoting your GitHub Repo OR Hugging Face Page OR Product Release OR Webinar etc.? Connect with us

The post Liquid AI Releases LFM2.5-VL-3B: A 3B Vision-Language Model That Reads Screens, Grounds Objects, and Calls Tools On-Device appeared first on MarkTechPost.

Exit mobile version